Catalyst’s structure is identified in six phases performed against sets of related activities, called framework areas, as shown in figure 6-1.
Figure 6-1. The Catalyst Project Management Structure
CSC/PBFI Advantage: Catalyst will provide flexible paths and consistent results for all CHART II Tasks.

Phases are Catalyst’s structure for sequencing and describing the work of business change and system development. They are a convenient mechanisms for establishing an overall sequence, are the basis for planning and estimating, facilitate project and program wide synchronization of activities, and chart decision points for management. There are six phases:
The Vision and Strategy phase examines the enterprise itself, its processes, and its overall automated support philosophy—a necessary first step to ensure that the automated systems provide tangible value to the enterprise.
The remaining four development phases address, respectively, what traditional life-cycle methodologies cover in system requirements and design, system implementation, system integration and test, and system deployment. Because much of the design required to support CHART II is being accomplished as part of this design runoff, it is the final development, integration, and deployment phases of Catalyst that are of particular interest for the implementation of CHART II.
The Catalyst framework is a flexible and adaptable structure within which the CSC/PBFI Team will plan, execute, integrate, test, deploy and maintain CHART II applications and systems. The framework areas are as follows:
Paths
are Catalyst’s approach to the development and maintenance of application systems. Separate paths flow horizontally through the Process Enablement parts of the architecture and development phases shown in figure 6-1. Each path satisfies different customer needs and initial conditions for the effort. In addition, four development paths, one maintenance path, and one application reengineering path is provided.For CHART II we will be employing a combination of two development paths: the traditional development approach combined with accelerated application development.
The RDD path offers a comprehensive life-cycle approach for our customers who require a comprehensive life cycle with checkpoints at each stage of the development. RDD is especially suited to large/complex systems with formally issued requirements, safety or mission critical criteria, and customer mandates. It is designed for large-scale system development.
A combination of these paths is required for CHART II because while we have a very specific set of software functional requirements that must be met, we also wish to retain the flexibility to use extensive prototyping, accept changes as development and implementation proceeds, and to employ accelerated application deployment. We will document this task-specific approach in the Program Management Plan to be provided to the MDSHA at the beginning of the project. (See Section 6.3, Our Five-Step Management Approach.)
Table 6-1 summarizes the major activities of each Catalyst phase and specialty area. While it is the Development phase and later phases that are most applicable to CHART II, a review of information normally obtained during the Vision and Strategy and Architecture phases will be made to ensure true understanding and a common point of beginning between MDSHA and its CSC/PBFI partners.
Catalyst provides the methodology to ensure that:
Table 6-1. Major Activities of Each Catalyst Phase.
CSC/PBFI Advantage: We will select the right Catalyst activities for each CHART II Activity.
|
Vision and Strategy Phase (Enterprise Planning) |
||||
|
|
|||
|
Architecture Phase (Overall Enterprise Systems Architecture and |
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
Organizational |
Technical |
Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development Phase (Configuration Item-Level |
||||
|
|
Organizational Change |
Technical |
Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(System) Integration Phase |
||||
|
|
|||
|
(System) Deployment Phase |
||||
|
|
|||
|
Operational Services |
||||
|
|
|||